Onibasu.com

[native-nutrition] Re: Carlson Cod Liver Oil Does Not Contain Synthetic Vitamins

  • Subject: Re: Carlson Cod Liver Oil Does Not Contain Synthetic Vitamins
  • From: "timjohan1" <timjohan1@...>
  • Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 15:25:46 -0000
  • Yahoo! Message Number: 69060
  • Onibasu Link: http://onibasu.com/archives/nn/69060.html

Remember here folks, this whole discussion is between me and the
members of this group. As stated in my first post, it is NOT
endorsed by Carlson. In fact, I don't believe they are yet aware of
this communication. My responses are fueled on a personal level by
numerous calls and e-mails from customers who have read posts on
this group.

However, when I get back to the office next week I will inform
Management of this communication and request that a copy of a
product information sheet be made available. Of course, if
approved, you will see on the document that no other ingredients are
listed besides cod liver oil, vitamin E including mixed tocopherols
from soy and natural lemon flavor (for the flavored version).

On a side note, I just remembered an issue that I wanted to comment
on. I believe it was Petteri who mentioned that he felt it was odd
that a company would list a single vitamin content for a natural cod
liver oil. He felt that a range would be more appropriate. What
Perreri did not consider is that Carlson has more than one label
printed and ready to be used pending the results of each batch
analysis. Therefore, if a batch contained 1,100 IU, that
corresponding label would be used. If a batch contained 900 IU then
that corresponding label would be used. It would actually be
cheaper and easier for Carlson print only one label with vitamin
content ranges. In fact, because of ever changing natural vitamin
contents and increasing label costs, Carlson is now doing just this.

Tim

--- In native-nutrition@yahoogroups.com, "Suze Fisher"
<s.fisher22@v...> wrote:

--- In native-nutrition@yahoogroups.com, "timjohan1"
<timjohan1@y...>
wrote:
Suze, how is it that you trust the information posted by Petteri
without seeing the specification sheet but you actually need to
see
one from me to prove his baseless information false?

Because YOUR product is the one avaialbe here in N. America that
many
WAPFer's are consuming, not the Moeller product. Why would any of
us
in N. America be concerned with the ingredients in a product only
distributed in Norway?



Carlson does
not authorize me to honor your request because the product specs
sheets are confidential. And, in my opinion, why should Carlson
have to release confidential spec sheets to combat the false
statements of a man who has no proof of validity with regards to
his
comments?

I have a request for you. Since Petteri was so readily given
this
spec sheet, why doesn't HE post that spec sheet? Perhaps
Carlson
will grant me permission when there is an actual valid need to
do
so.


Huh. HOW is it NOT a valid need to provide a product information
sheet to potential customers who are leary of the product's
ingredients and want to KNOW WHAT THEY ARE CONSUMING. Is it too
much
to ask what it is we are putting into our mouths? I dunno, but I
have
this crazy idea that that is an "actual valid need."

You know, I once called a CLO manufacturer here in N. America and
requested an assay on their product, and they didn't tell
me, "well,
your desire to know what's in our product before you consume it
isn't 'an actual valid need' so we're not telling." Rather, they
said
sure, we'll send an assay. And they did. And I became their
customer.


With regards to who I am, here are some supportive links that I
do
indeed work for Carlson.

http://www.hsrmagazine.com/articles/311cover.html

http://www.carlsonlabs.com/newsletter5.html

Tim Johanek

Thanks for that. I guess my point was that we on this list don't
know
you, whether or not you work for Carlson's, so we have no idea if
we
can trust your word on this product. The fact that you work for
Carslon's still doesn't tell us that whatever you say about the
product is the truth (especially when Carlsons is not forthcoming
wiht proof about what's in the product). I really don't mean this
in
a disrespectful way, but, you know, most folks active on this list
are quite familiar with the spin put out by many companies and
their
employeesa about the products they promote. Since you haven't been
around for a while posting about a variety of issues, we simply
don't
know you well enough to take your word as gospel. That's what I
meant
by "we don't know you".

Like I said, this could all be laid to rest with a simple product
information sheet, or whatever the equivalent is here in the U.S.
(as
long as it lists the ingredients in the product). I would also
like
to see an assay of contaminants, now that we're on the subject.
Or,
is that also confidential?


Sincerely,
Suze Fisher




Onibasu Link: http://onibasu.com/archives/nn/69060.html

Search This Archive

 

Recent Blogs »

Tips!

We now support Yahoo! message number portability. Tell me more »

Do you want to see your Yahoo! group archived in Onibasu? Click here for more details.