[native-nutrition] Re: Carlson Cod Liver Oil Does Not Contain Synthetic Vitamins
- Subject: Re: Carlson Cod Liver Oil Does Not Contain Synthetic Vitamins
- From: "pkankkunen" <petteri.kankkunen@...>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 07:20:25 -0000
- Yahoo! Message Number: 69085
- Onibasu Link: http://onibasu.com/archives/nn/69085.html
Yes Tim, I do know what I'm talking about. Actually, Möller's
Finnish
importer Tamro has the spec sheet available on-line as a .pdf-file.
The site doesn't seem to be working right now but you can access it
via Google's cached pages. Here's the direct link:
http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:lwiySXLRaO4J:
www.kalanmaksaoljy.fi:8888/Tamro_Suomi/tamrosuomi.
nsf/304c79868e05cc4e42256c8a003ea944/bbd1fd5b67118
1eec2256d56001b36da/%24FILE/_39dgmoobedlgmmsr1ihm6
ku90edkn8sjleln62_.pdf+kromivihreisiin+natronkalkk
i-lasipulloihin&hl=fi
If you're interested you can order the sheet as a official notice from
our National agency for medicines. They will likely charge you for it
and it wil still be in finnish. Here you can find the contact
information:
http://www.laakelaitos.fi/english/about_us/contact
_information/index.html
I'm sorry if my poor english lead people believe that Carlson's has
one thing or the other. What I meant to say in my original post was
that Carson's should be able to provide a spec sheet that list the
ingredients, not that I know the ingredients are similiar. But that
has been now discussed.
My intention was to point out what most CLO produts are made of
nowadays. All CLO-products sold in my country have added synthetic
vitamins. When I asked Agusta Hardardottir, the Export Manager of Lysi
(the biggest producer of cod liver oil), she said they do not have
unbleached and undeodorized cod liver oil with natural vitamins A and
D on stock so this kind of oil would therefore be produced according
to a mutually agreed specification.
So yes, there's a growing number of people who need convincing that
the vitamins in any given CLO are natural. And for a good reason.
Petteri
--- In native-nutrition@yahoogroups.com, "timjohan1" <timjohan1@y...>
wrote:
Remember here folks, this whole discussion is between me and theof
members of this group. As stated in my first post, it is NOT
endorsed by Carlson. In fact, I don't believe they are yet aware
this communication. My responses are fueled on a personal level byare
numerous calls and e-mails from customers who have read posts on
this group.
However, when I get back to the office next week I will inform
Management of this communication and request that a copy of a
product information sheet be made available. Of course, if
approved, you will see on the document that no other ingredients
listed besides cod liver oil, vitamin E including mixed tocopherolscod
from soy and natural lemon flavor (for the flavored version).
On a side note, I just remembered an issue that I wanted to comment
on. I believe it was Petteri who mentioned that he felt it was odd
that a company would list a single vitamin content for a natural
liver oil. He felt that a range would be more appropriate. Whatthen
Perreri did not consider is that Carlson has more than one label
printed and ready to be used pending the results of each batch
analysis. Therefore, if a batch contained 1,100 IU, that
corresponding label would be used. If a batch contained 900 IU
that corresponding label would be used. It would actually bePetteri
cheaper and easier for Carlson print only one label with vitamin
content ranges. In fact, because of ever changing natural vitamin
contents and increasing label costs, Carlson is now doing just this.
Tim
--- In native-nutrition@yahoogroups.com, "Suze Fisher"
<s.fisher22@v...> wrote:
--- In native-nutrition@yahoogroups.com, "timjohan1"<timjohan1@y...>
wrote:
Suze, how is it that you trust the information posted by
specsseewithout seeing the specification sheet but you actually need to
manyone from me to prove his baseless information false?
Because YOUR product is the one avaialbe here in N. America that
WAPFer's are consuming, not the Moeller product. Why would any ofus
in N. America be concerned with the ingredients in a product only
distributed in Norway?
Carlson does
not authorize me to honor your request because the product
Carlsonsheets are confidential. And, in my opinion, why should
tohave to release confidential spec sheets to combat the false
statements of a man who has no proof of validity with regards
listhisthis
comments?
I have a request for you. Since Petteri was so readily given
Carlsonspec sheet, why doesn't HE post that spec sheet? Perhaps
dowill grant me permission when there is an actual valid need to
so.much
Huh. HOW is it NOT a valid need to provide a product information
sheet to potential customers who are leary of the product's
ingredients and want to KNOW WHAT THEY ARE CONSUMING. Is it too
to ask what it is we are putting into our mouths? I dunno, but Ihave
this crazy idea that that is an "actual valid need."me, "well,
You know, I once called a CLO manufacturer here in N. America and
requested an assay on their product, and they didn't tell
your desire to know what's in our product before you consume itsaid
isn't 'an actual valid need' so we're not telling." Rather, they
sure, we'll send an assay. And they did. And I became theircustomer.
do
With regards to who I am, here are some supportive links that I
knowindeed work for Carlson.
http://www.hsrmagazine.com/articles/311cover.html
http://www.carlsonlabs.com/newsletter5.html
Tim Johanek
Thanks for that. I guess my point was that we on this list don't
you, whether or not you work for Carlson's, so we have no idea ifwe
can trust your word on this product. The fact that you work forin
Carslon's still doesn't tell us that whatever you say about the
product is the truth (especially when Carlsons is not forthcoming
wiht proof about what's in the product). I really don't mean this
a disrespectful way, but, you know, most folks active on this
beenare quite familiar with the spin put out by many companies andtheir
employeesa about the products they promote. Since you haven't
around for a while posting about a variety of issues, we simplydon't
know you well enough to take your word as gospel. That's what Imeant
by "we don't know you".(as
Like I said, this could all be laid to rest with a simple product
information sheet, or whatever the equivalent is here in the U.S.
long as it lists the ingredients in the product). I would alsolike
to see an assay of contaminants, now that we're on the subject.Or,
is that also confidential?
Sincerely,
Suze Fisher
Onibasu Link: http://onibasu.com/archives/nn/69085.html